Newest-generation drug-eluting and bare-metal stents combined with prasugrel-based antiplatelet therapy in large coronary arteries: The BAsel Stent Kosten Effektivitäts Trial PROspective Validation Examination part II (BASKET-PROVE II) trial design.
Am Heart J. 2012 Feb;163(2):136-141.e1
Authors: Jeger R, Pfisterer M, Alber H, Eberli F, Galatius S, Naber C, Pedrazzini G, Rickli H, Jensen JS, Vuilliomenet A, Gilgen N, Kaiser C
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the BAsel Stent Kosten Effektivitäts Trial PROspective Validation Examination (BASKET-PROVE), drug-eluting stents (DESs) had similar 2-year rates of death and myocardial infarction but lower rates of target vessel revascularization and major adverse cardiac events compared with bare-metal stents (BMSs). However, comparative clinical effects of newest-generation DES with biodegradable polymers vs second-generation DES or newest-generation BMS with biocompatible coatings, all combined with a prasugrel-based antiplatelet therapy, on 2-year outcomes are not known.
METHODS: In BASKET-PROVE II, 2,400 patients with de novo lesions in native vessels ≥3 mm in diameter are randomized 1:1:1 to receive a conventional DES, a DES with a biodegradable polymer, or a BMS with biocompatible coating. In addition to aspirin, stable patients with BMS will receive prasugrel for 1 month, whereas all others will receive prasugrel for 12 months. The primary end point will be combined cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization up to 2 years. Secondary end points include stent thrombosis and major bleeding. The primary aim is to test (1) the noninferiority of a biodegradable-polymer DES to a conventional DES and (2) the superiority of both DESs to BMS. A secondary aim is to compare the outcomes with those of BASKET-PROVE regarding the effects of prasugrel-based vs clopidogrel-based antiplatelet therapy.
RESULTS: By the end of 2010, 878 patients (37% of those planned) were enrolled.
CONCLUSIONS: This study will test the comparative long-term safety and efficacy of newest-generation stents on the background of contemporary antiplatelet therapy in a large all-comer population undergoing large native coronary artery stenting.
Rationale and design of the TAXUS Libertē Post-Approval Study: Examination of patients receiving the TAXUS Liberté stent with concomitant prasugrel therapy in routine interventional cardiology practice.
Am Heart J. 2012 Feb;163(2):142-148.e6
Authors: Garratt KN, Lee DP, Rose EM, Windle KJ, Liao H, Nwachuku CE, Winters KJ, Bowman TS, Dawkins KD
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Observational studies of new coronary stents are necessary to assess performance in a variety of complex patient and lesion types. Furthermore, the optimal dose and duration of thienopyridine treatment is unclear, particularly in patients with complex clinical conditions. The TAXUS Libertē Post-Approval Study is designed to provide 5-year data on the TAXUS Liberté paclitaxel-eluting stent with concomitant prasugrel therapy in routine clinical practice and to contribute data to the DAPT study.
STUDY DESIGN: The TAXUS Libertē Post-Approval Study is a prospective, multicenter, observational study. Enrollment of approximately 4,200 patients receiving ≥1 TAXUS Liberté stents is planned. All patients without a contraindication will be prescribed prasugrel plus aspirin for 1 year. The 12-month primary end point of cardiac death or myocardial infarction in on-label stent patients will be compared with historical TAXUS Express stent data from the TAXUS ATLAS and TAXUS ARRIVE studies. Secondary clinical end points include stent thrombosis, all-cause death, stroke, revascularization, and bleeding in all patients. In addition, this study will be the first to evaluate prasugrel use in a routine practice setting (including 5 and 10 mg daily doses) and will contribute data to the DAPT Study, comparing 12 versus 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent placement.
SUMMARY: The TAXUS Libertē Post-Approval Study will be the first to provide long-term real-world data on use of the TAXUS Liberté Stent with prasugrel treatment. The study is currently enrolling, and primary end point data are expected in mid 2013.
Design of the RELAXin in Acute Heart Failure Study.
Am Heart J. 2012 Feb;163(2):149-155.e1
Authors: Ponikowski P, Metra M, Teerlink JR, Unemori E, Felker GM, Voors AA, Filippatos G, Greenberg B, Teichman SL, Severin T, Mueller-Velten G, Cotter G, Davison BA
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure (AHF) remains a major public health burden with a high prevalence and poor prognosis. Relaxin is a naturally occurring peptide hormone that increases cardiac output, arterial compliance, and renal blood flow during pregnancy. The RELAX-AHF-1 study will evaluate the effect of RLX030 (recombinant form of human relaxin 2) on symptom relief and clinical outcomes in patients with AHF.
METHODS: The protocol includes a completed phase 2 234-patient dose-finding study (Pre-RELAX-AHF) and an ongoing phase 3 1,160-patient trial (RELAX-AHF-1). Patients with AHF and systolic blood pressure >125 mm Hg are randomized within 16 hours of presentation to a 48-hour IV infusion of RLX030 or placebo. The 30 μg/kg per day dose of RLX030 was chosen for RELAX-AHF-1 based on effects on dyspnea, clinical outcomes, and safety observed in Pre-RELAX-AHF. Primary efficacy end points in RELAX-AHF-1 are (1) the area under the curve of change of the dyspnea Visual Analog Scale from baseline through day 5 and (2) whether the patient reports moderately to markedly better dyspnea at 6, 12, and 24 hours. Secondary efficacy end points include days alive and out of the hospital through day 60 and cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure or renal failure through day 60. Patients will be followed up through day 180 for mortality. As of September 19, 2011, 978 patients have been enrolled.
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-RELAX-AHF results suggested that infusion of RLX030 may accelerate dyspnea relief and improve prognosis in patients hospitalized with AHF. RELAX-AHF-1 will further evaluate these effects.
BACKGROUND: Interfering with angiogenesis is an effective, widely used approach to cancer therapy, but antiangiogenic therapies have been associated with important systemic cardiovascular toxicities such as hypertension, left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, and myocardial ischemia and infarction. As the use of vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway (VSP) inhibitors broadens to include older patients and those with existing cardiovascular disease, the adverse effects are likely to be more frequent, and cardiologists will increasingly be enlisted to help oncologists manage patients who develop adverse cardiovascular effects.
METHODS: The Cardiovascular Toxicities Panel of the National Cancer Institute reviewed the published literature and abstracts from major meetings, shared experience gained during clinical development of VSP inhibitors, and contributed extensive clinical experience in evaluating and treating patients with cancer with cardiovascular disease. This report was edited and approved by the National Cancer Institute Investigational Drug Steering Committee. It presents the panel’s expert opinion on the current clinical use and future investigation for safer, more expansive use of these drugs.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The panel recommends that physicians (1) conduct and document a formal risk assessment for existing cardiovascular disease and potential cardiovascular complications before VSP inhibitor treatment recognizing that preexisting hypertension and cardiovascular disease are common in patients with cancer, (2) actively monitor for blood pressure elevations and cardiac toxicity with more frequent assessments during the first treatment cycle, and (3) aggressively manage blood pressure elevations and early symptoms and signs of cardiac toxicity to prevent clinically limiting complications of VSP inhibitor therapy.
Detection of periodontal bacteria in thrombi of patients with acute myocardial infarction by polymerase chain reaction.
Am Heart J. 2012 Feb;163(2):164-7
Authors: Ohki T, Itabashi Y, Kohno T, Yoshizawa A, Nishikubo S, Watanabe S, Yamane G, Ishihara K
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS: Numerous reports have demonstrated that periodontal bacteria are present in plaques from atherosclerotic arteries. Although periodontitis has recently been recognized as a risk factor for coronary artery disease, the direct relationship between periodontal bacteria and coronary artery disease has not yet been clarified. It has been suggested that these bacteria might contribute to inflammation and plaque instability. We assumed that if periodontal bacteria induce inflammation of plaque, the bacteria would be released into the bloodstream when vulnerable plaque ruptures. To determine whether periodontal bacteria are present in thrombi at the site of acute myocardial infarction, we tried to detect periodontal bacteria in thrombi of patients with acute myocardial infarction by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
METHODS: We studied 81 consecutive adults with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). All patients underwent removal of thrombus with aspiration catheters at the beginning of percutaneous coronary intervention, and a small sample of thrombus was obtained for PCR.
RESULTS: The detection rates of periodontal bacteria by PCR were 19.7% for Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, 3.4% for Porphyromonas gingivalis, and 2.3% for Treponema denticola.
CONCLUSIONS: Three species of periodontal bacteria were detected in the thrombi of patients with acute myocardial infarction. This raises the possibility that such bacteria are latently present in plaque and also suggests that these bacteria might have a role in plaque inflammation and instability.
High-concentration versus titrated oxygen therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A pilot randomized controlled trial.
Am Heart J. 2012 Feb;163(2):168-75
Authors: Ranchord AM, Argyle R, Beynon R, Perrin K, Sharma V, Weatherall M, Simmonds M, Heatlie G, Brooks N, Beasley R
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to oxygen therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is uncertain.
METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was undertaken in which 136 patients presenting with their first STEMI uncomplicated by cardiogenic shock or marked hypoxia were randomized to receive high-concentration (6 L/min via medium concentration mask) or titrated oxygen (to achieve oxygen saturation 93%-96%) for 6 hours after presentation. The main outcome variables were 30-day mortality and infarct size assessed by troponin T level at 72 hours. Secondary outcomes included a meta-analysis of mortality data from this study and previous randomized controlled trials, and infarct size was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging at 4 to 6 weeks.
RESULTS: There were 1 of 68 and 2 of 68 deaths in the high-concentration and titrated oxygen groups, respectively; a meta-analysis including these data with those from the 2 previous studies showed an odds ratio for mortality of high-concentration oxygen compared with room air or titrated oxygen of 2.2 (95% CI 0.8-6.0). There was no significant difference between high-concentration versus titrated oxygen in troponin T (ratio of mean levels 0.74, 95% CI 0.50-1.1, P = .14), infarct mass (mean difference -0.8 g, 95% CI -7.6 to 6.1, P = .82), or percent infarct mass (mean difference -0.6%, 95% CI -5.6 to 4.5, P = .83).
CONCLUSION: This study found no evidence of benefit or harm from high-concentration compared with titrated oxygen in initially uncomplicated STEMI. However, our estimates have wide CIs, and as a result, large randomized controlled trials are required to resolve the clinical uncertainty.
Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in the pharmacoinvasive management of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Insights from the TRANSFER-AMI trial.
Am Heart J. 2012 Feb;163(2):176-181.e2
Authors: Lavi S, Cantor WJ, Casanova A, Tan MK, Yan AT, Džavík V, Fitchett D, Cohen EA, Borgundvaag B, Heffernan M, Ducas J, Goodman SG
Abstract
AIMS: An early invasive strategy after fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) improves outcomes, but the relative efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) as part of this approach are unknown.
METHODS AND RESULTS: In the TRANSFER-AMI trial, patients with high-risk STEMI received fibrinolysis and were then randomized to either standard treatment or to immediate transfer for coronary angiography. In this substudy, the outcome of patients aged <75 years treated with enoxaparin is compared with that of patients who received UFH. Logistic regression and propensity score models were used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these anticoagulants. Enoxaparin was administered to 498 patients, and UFH, to 448 patients, at the time of fibrinolysis. Approximately 50% in each group were randomized to the early invasive strategy. The primary composite end point of death, reinfarction, recurrent ischemia, new or worsening heart failure, or cardiogenic shock at 30 days occurred in 11.9% and 11.6% of the patients who received enoxaparin and UFH, respectively (adjusted odds ratio 0.95 [95% CI 0.60-1.51], P = .84). Enoxaparin use was associated with more access site bleeding (5.0% vs 2.9%, P = .04) and mild bleeding (12.1% vs 7.8%, P = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk patients with STEMI undergoing early or late transfer for cardiac catheterization after fibrinolysis, enoxaparin was associated with similar efficacy compared with UFH, but there was more minor bleeding with enoxaparin (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT00164190).
Reduced immediate ischemic events with cangrelor in PCI: A pooled analysis of the CHAMPION trials using the universal definition of myocardial infarction.
Am Heart J. 2012 Feb;163(2):182-190.e4
Authors: White HD, Chew DP, Dauerman HL, Mahaffey KW, Gibson CM, Stone GW, Gruberg L, Harrington RA, Bhatt DL
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a clinical need for an intravenous P2Y(12) inhibitor in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) for patients who are unable to take oral medications or might benefit from a rapidly reversible compound. As the time from admission to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) shortens, establishing the benefit of novel therapies impacting ischemic events is increasingly challenging. Cangrelor, an intravenous potent rapidly acting P2Y(12) inhibitor, bolus 30 μg/Kg plus infusion of 4 μg/Kg/min, was compared to a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel either before or early after PCI in patients with ACS undergoing PCI in The CHAMPION (Cangrelor versus standard tHerapy to Achieve optimal Management of Platelet InhibitiON) PLATFORM and PCI studies.
METHODS: As both CHAMPION studies used similar inclusion/exclusion criteria and death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization (including stent thrombosis) at 48 hours as their primary end points, the studies were pooled. The clinical events committee adjudicated myocardial infarction. The universal definition was used to define myocardial infarction.
RESULTS: A total of 13 049 patients were included. Cangrelor had no effect on the primary end point with the original MI definition (P = .646). With the use of the universal definition, the primary end point was decreased with cangrelor (odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.99, P = .037). Stent thrombosis was reduced from 0.4% to 0.2% (odds ratio 0.44, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.87, P = .018). Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major bleeding and transfusions were not increased with cangrelor.
CONCLUSION: With the use of the universal definition of myocardial infarction, cangrelor was associated with a significant reduction in early ischemic events when compared with clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-elevation ACS undergoing PCI.
Statin treatment for coronary artery plaque composition based on intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis.
Am Heart J. 2012 Feb;163(2):191-199.e1
Authors: Nozue T, Yamamoto S, Tohyama S, Umezawa S, Kunishima T, Sato A, Miyake S, Takeyama Y, Morino Y, Yamauchi T, Muramatsu T, Hibi K, Sozu T, Terashima M, Michishita I
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Systemic therapy with statin has been shown to lower the risk of coronary events; however, the in vivo effects of statin therapy on plaque volume and composition are less understood.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open-labeled, randomized, multicenter study in 11 centers in Japan. A total of 164 patients were randomized to receive either 4 mg/d of pitavastatin (intensive lipid-lowering therapy) or 20 mg/d of pravastatin (moderate lipid-lowering therapy). Analyzable intravascular ultrasound data were obtained for 119 patients at baseline and at 8-month follow-up. The primary end point was the difference of volume changes in each of the 4 main plaque components (fibrosis, fibrofatty, calcium, and necrosis), assessed by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound, between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: The mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level at follow-up was significantly lower in the pitavastatin than in the pravastatin group (74 vs 95 mg/dL, P < .0001). During the 8-month follow-up period, statin therapy reduced the absolute and relative amount of fibrofatty component (pitavastatin: from 1.09 to 0.81 mm(3)/mm, P = .001; pravastatin: from 1.05 to 0.83 mm(3)/mm, P = .0008) and increased in the amount of calcium (pitavastatin: from 0.42 to 0.55 mm(3)/mm, P < .0001; pravastatin: from 0.44 to 0.55 mm(3)/mm, P = .005), whereas volume changes in both plaque components were not statistically different between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Both pitavastatin and pravastatin altered coronary artery plaque composition by significantly decreasing the fibrofatty plaque component and increasing the calcified plaque component.
PMID: 22305836 [PubMed - in process]
PubMed requires this notice of disclaimer is present.
